Top/Public/ABET/Rubrics/(k:1)

East Carolina University
Department of Computer Science

Rubric for evaluating outcome (k)(3)


Curriculum
Courses
ABET
SACS

Data by course
Data by term
ETS MFT data
Current forms

Maintaining this site

Quality of testing.

Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good
No testing was performed, OR, justification for the choice of test cases is missing, OR the justification for the choice of test cases does not relate to the features defined in the requirements documents. Most of the test cases do not adequately cover the features defined in the requirements documents. Most of test cases were not defined correctly. Most testing was not correctly performed or not documented. Documentation shows that test cases are developed based on predefined test selection and adequacy criteria. Over 60% test cases include input, output and constraints. Over 60% of the testable features in the requirements definitions have at least one test case. Over 60% of test cases are correctly defined. Unit test, integration test, system test, and regression test (if applicable) are generally correctly performed and documented. Documentation shows that test cases are developed based on predefined test selection and adequacy criteria. Each test case includes input, output and constraints. Over 80% of the testable features in the requirements definitions have at least one test case correctly defined and performed. Unit test, integration test, system test, and regression test (if applicable) are correctly performed and well documented.